McVay v. Stefanou et al
| Darya McVay |
| Spa Thea, LLC and Andreas Stefanou |
| 3:2020cv00764 |
| June 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Charles S Haight |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss by Spa Thea, LLC, Andreas Stefanou.Responses due by 8/4/2020 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Kaiser, John) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by John B. Kaiser on behalf of Spa Thea, LLC, Andreas Stefanou (Kaiser, John) |
| Filing 10 First SUMMONS Returned Executed by Darya McVay. All Plaintiffs. (Nevas, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Spa Thea, LLC, Andreas Stefanou* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Stephen E. Nevas* *Nevas Law Group LLC* *237 Post Road West* *Westport, CT 06880*. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Nevas, Stephen) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having minimal income, minimal assets, and outstanding debt. See generally id. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (Doc. #1 ) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds that the claims asserted may proceed to service of process on the defendants. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/17/2020. (Spangenburg, S.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC ORDER. This matter is also referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for an initial review of the #1 Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 06/12/20. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER. This matter is respectfully referred to United States Magistrate Judge Merriam for a ruling on Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on June 10, 2020. (Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 06/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Form)(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 06/2/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/1/2020. Discovery due by 12/2/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 1/6/2021. Signed by Clerk on 06/2/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Darya McVay. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Spa Thea, LLC, Andreas Stefanou, filed by Darya McVay.(Fazekas, J.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Spa Thea, LLC, Andreas Stefanou. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 6/3/2020 to correct date (Fazekas, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
