McAdams v. Walmart, Inc.
| Stacy McAdams |
| Walmart, Inc. |
| 3:2020cv00950 |
| July 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Walmart, Inc..(Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Stacy McAdams AS TO JURISDICTIONAL AMOUNT IN CONTROVERSY (Formica, Glenn) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walmart, Inc., #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Janice D. Lai Walmart, Inc., #7 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Walmart, Inc., #4 Statement of No Pending Motions filed by Walmart, Inc., #8 Standing Protective Order, #5 Certificate of Filing Copy of Notice of Removal In State Court ) filed by Walmart, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 07/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 8
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/7/2020. Discovery due by 1/8/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 2/12/2021. Signed by Clerk on 07/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Walmart, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Certificate of Filing Copy of Notice of Removal In State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Walmart, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal - Statement of No Pending Motions (Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Walmart, Inc.. (Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Janice D. Lai on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Lai, Janice) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart, Inc. from Superior Court New Haven, case number DBD-CV20-6036474-S. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-5962915, filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Lai, Janice) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McAdams v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy McAdams | |
| Represented By: | Glenn L. Formica |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Janice D. Lai |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
