McArthur v. Alexis et al
Alexander McArthur |
Alexis and Property Management |
3:2020cv01065 |
July 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
Civil Rights: Other |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USM 285 forms together with Notice of Lawsuit/Request for Waiver of Service of Summons, OPTD, Electronic Filing Order, Standing Protective Order, Guide for Self-Represented Litigants, Consent to electronic notice by pro se litigant and Motion by pro se litigant to participate in electronic filing and all instructions mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Protective Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Alexander McArthur, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Alexander McArthur, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 9/4/2020.(Oliver, T.) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. McArthur has recently filed two dozen cases that are all pending before me. In each of those cases, McArthur has made a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Although McArthur does not include all relevant information in any one motion, I glean from all those motions that McArthur has been unemployed since 2009, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Yale New Haven Hospital, et al., No. 3:20-cv-998, has little-to-no real or personal property of value, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Cargil, et al., No. 3:20-cv-967, earns his only income, $783 per month, from social security, see id., and has monthly obligations totaling at least $343, see Mot. for IFP, Doc. No. 2, McArthur v. Alexis, et al., No. 3:20-cv-1159 (notably, that total does not include monthly expenditures on food and clothing). At this stage, McArthur's allegations are sufficient to establish that he is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. s. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, McArthur's motion to leave to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. no. #2 , is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/4/2020. (Smith, E) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/28/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/28/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/26/2020 Discovery due by 1/27/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 3/3/2021 Signed by Clerk on 07/28/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Alexander McArthur. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alexis, Property Management, filed by Alexander McArthur.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.