R-K Black Rock I, LLC v. Gap, Inc.
Plaintiff: R-K Black Rock I, LLC
Defendant: The Gap, Inc. and Gap, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv01070
Filed: July 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Alfred V Covello
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2020 Case remanded to State Court Judicial District of Bridgeport. (Bozek, M.)
August 25, 2020 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Bozek, M.)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER finding as moot #13 motion to stay; granting #15 motion to remand. The clerk is hereby directed to remand this case to the state court. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 08/25/20. (Covello, Alfred)
August 21, 2020 Filing 15 Joint MOTION to Remand to State Court by Gap, Inc..Responses due by 9/11/2020 (Brown, Matthew)
August 11, 2020 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) and Special Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against R-K Black Rock I, LLC by Gap, Inc..(Brown, Matthew)
August 10, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Stay by Gap, Inc..Responses due by 8/31/2020 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Stay Proceeding)(Brown, Matthew)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER finding as moot #10 motion for extension of time; granting #11 motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint, to and including August 11, 2020. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 08/06/20. (Covello, Alfred)
July 30, 2020 Filing 11 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time until August 11, 2020 to Plead by Gap, Inc.. (Brown, Matthew)
July 30, 2020 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until August 11, 2020 to Plead #1 Notice of Removal, by Gap, Inc.. (Brown, Matthew)
July 29, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gap, Inc., #6 Notice of Appearance filed by Gap, Inc., #3 Notice (Other) filed by Gap, Inc., #4 Notice (Other) filed by Gap, Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Gap, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Gap, Inc., and #8 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 7/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Bozek, M.)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 7/28/2020.(Bozek, M.)
July 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/26/2020. Discovery due by 1/27/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 3/3/2021. Signed by Clerk on 7/28/2020.(Bozek, M.)
July 28, 2020 Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Oliver, T.)
July 28, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua N. Taylor on behalf of The Gap, Inc. (Taylor, Joshua)
July 28, 2020 Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Gap, Inc.. (Brown, Matthew)
July 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE by The Gap, Inc. of Pending Motions (Brown, Matthew)
July 28, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE by The Gap, Inc. Statement Pursuant to Standing Order on Removed Cases (Brown, Matthew)
July 28, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew C. Brown on behalf of The Gap, Inc. (Brown, Matthew)
July 28, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Gap, Inc. from [docket number not yet determined as Plaintiff has not returned/filed the state court complaint to date] Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-6000608, filed by The Gap, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brown, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R-K Black Rock I, LLC v. Gap, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R-K Black Rock I, LLC
Represented By: Matthew J Schenker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Gap, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew C. Brown
Represented By: Joshua N. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gap, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua N. Taylor
Represented By: Matthew C. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?