Jean-Baptiste v. Titereaul et al
Plaintiff: Oles Jean-Baptiste
Defendant: John Doe, Norwich Police Station and Titereaul
Case Number: 3:2020cv01089
Filed: July 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER. The court orders Jean-Baptiste to file, within thirty (30) days of this Order, an amended complaint that includes a request of relief and that alleges facts showing the personal involvement of any defendant against whom he seeks damages. Further, if he seeks to hold Norwich responsible, he should name it as a defendant, not the police station. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/24/2020. (Reis, Julia)
August 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of this case. Signed by Judge William I. Garfinkel on 8/4/20. (Payton, R.)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 07/31/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 07/31/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 07/31/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Filing 4 PRISCS - MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Fazekas, J.)
July 31, 2020 Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jean-Baptiste v. Titereaul et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oles Jean-Baptiste
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norwich Police Station
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Titereaul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?