James et al v. MetLife Group, Inc.
| Tenisha James and Natasha Jarvis |
| Metlife Group Inc |
| 3:2020cv01113 |
| August 5, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 206 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Metlife Group Inc.(Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 16
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #13 MOTION for Attorney(s) Martin Harris to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6068893), #11 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/25/2020 File Responsive Pleading by Metlife Group Inc. (Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 11/1/2020. Signed by Clerk on 9/2/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/25/2020 File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/2/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Metlife Group Inc to 9/25/2020. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Attorney(s) Martin Harris to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6068893) by Metlife Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 12
First Corporate Disclosure Statement by Metlife Group Inc. (Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 11
First MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/25/2020 File Responsive Pleading by Metlife Group Inc. (Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Marylou Fabbo on behalf of Metlife Group Inc (Fabbo, Marylou)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tenisha James, Natasha Jarvis. Metlife Group Inc served on 8/14/2020, answer due 9/4/2020. (Cicchiello, Emanuele)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Emanuele Robert Cicchiello on behalf of Tenisha James, Natasha Jarvis (Cicchiello, Emanuele)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metlife Group Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael John Reilly* *Cicchiello & Cicchiello, LLP* *364 Franklin Avenue* *Hartford, CT 06114*. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #5 Order, #1 Complaint filed by Tenisha James, Natasha Jarvis, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/5/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER FOR FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CASES Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/5/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/5/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/5/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/4/2020 Discovery due by 2/4/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 3/11/2021 Signed by Clerk on 8/5/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against MetLife Group, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6015323.), filed by Tenisha James, Natasha Jarvis.(Reilly, Michael)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to MetLife Group, Inc.. (Reilly, Michael)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
