Howell v. Meriden et al
| Stephanie Howell |
| City of Meriden, Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury and Jeffry Cosette |
| 3:2020cv01150 |
| August 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Special Defenses by Ethan Busa, Jeffry Cosette, Michael Lounsbury, City of Meriden.(Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties Rule 26(f) Report is overdue. It shall be filed on or before 10/19/2020. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 10/09/2020.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting on consent #14 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/15/2020. (Cahill, Leslie)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for all Defendants to 10/19/2020. (Cahill, Leslie)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Extension of Time until October 17, 2020 to respond to the plaintiffs complaint by City of Meriden. (Annunziata, Carmine)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Counsel are reminded that pursuant to Local Rule 7(b)(3): "All motions for extension of time shall be filed at least three (3) days before the deadline sought to be extended, except in cases in which compelling circumstances warranting an extension arise during the three days before the deadline. Any motion for extension of time filed fewer than three days before the deadline sought to be extended shall, in addition to satisfying all other requirements of this Rule, set forth reasons why the motion was not filed at least three days before the deadline in question." Per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2), the Defendants' answer to the complaint was due 7 days after the notice of removal was filed, i.e., August 18, 2020, and the motion is therefore not timely. Future failures to comply with Local Rule 7(b)(3) may result in the denial of non-compliant motions for extension of time without prejudice to refiling of a compliant motion. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/8/2020. (Cahill, Leslie)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for all Defendants to 9/17/2020. (Cahill, Leslie)
|
|
Filing 12
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until September 17, 2020 to respond to the plaintiff's complaint. by City of Meriden. (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE by Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury, City of Meriden Certification Regarding Pending Motions (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE by Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury, City of Meriden Notice of Compliance with Standing Order (Roberts, Richard)
|
|
Filing 9
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Stephanie Howell. (Spinella, A.)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by A. Paul Spinella on behalf of Stephanie Howell (Spinella, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
Docket Entry Correction re #6 Electronic Service Documents, ADDED PDF Removal Standing Order. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by City of Meriden, Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 08/13/2020.(Fazekas, J.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/13/2020: #1 ADDED PDF - Removal Standing Order) (Fazekas, J.).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Dellolio on behalf of City of Meriden (Dellolio, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 08/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 08/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/10/2020. Discovery due by 2/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 3/17/2021. Signed by Clerk on 8/11/2020.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 8/13/2020 to correct file date(Fazekas, J.).
|
|
Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Meriden, Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury from New Haven Superior Court, case number CV-20-6106325-S. Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ACTDC-6025873, filed by City of Meriden, Ethan Busa, Michael Lounsbury. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Roberts, Richard) Modified on 8/11/2020 to correct parties (Nuzzi, Tiffany).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
