Velez v. Saul
| Edgar Velez |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv01255 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time for good cause. This is the Defendant's first motion for extension of time, there is a reported backlog that is the result of the pandemic and not the Defendant's lack of diligence, and the Plaintiff has consented to this extension. The deadline to file the certified administrative record is extended to 12/9/2020. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/20/2020. (Burlingham, Corinne)
|
| Answer deadline updated to 12/9/2020 per Dkt. 13 Order. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until December 9, 2020 the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support)(Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 9/22/2020. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Vanessa L. Bryant for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 9/22/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #3 . Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no employment income and no assets. See generally id. at 3-5. Plaintiff also states that he receives "Food Stamps and Husky D and [Section] 8" housing. Id. at 3 (sic). At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/28/2020. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/26/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/26/2020. (Reis, Julia)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edgar Velez. (Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Edgar Velez (Reis, Julia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Edgar Velez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Julia) |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 10/25/2020. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
