Bento v. Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Anthony Bento
Defendant: Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv01394
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Charles S Haight
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: False Claims Act
Cause of Action: 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, absent objection and for good cause shown, Plaintiff's #15 Consent Motion for Extension of Briefing Deadlines. Accordingly, the Court hereby extends Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendant's #13 Motion to Dismiss to on or before December 24, 2020, and Defendant's deadline to reply to Plaintiff's response to on or before January 25, 2021. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on November 14, 2020. (Dorais, L.)
November 13, 2020 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted until December 3, 2020 by Anthony Bento. (Saluck, Jill)
November 12, 2020 Filing 14 Memorandum in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Kuuku Minnah-Donkoh Declaration in support, #2 Exhibit Complaint)(Minnah-Donkoh, Kuuku)
November 12, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted by Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc..Responses due by 12/3/2020 (Minnah-Donkoh, Kuuku)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kuuku Minnah-Donkoh and Sebastian Clark. Signed by Clerk on 10/20/2020. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
October 19, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Kuuku Minnah-Donkoh and Sebastian Clarkin to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $400 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6164174) by Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit KMD & Cert of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit Affidavit SC & Cert of Good Standing)(O'Malley, Regen)
October 12, 2020 Answer deadline updated for Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc. to 11/12/2020. (Barry, Donna)
October 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting Defendant's #9 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, absent opposition and for good cause shown. Therefore, Defendant must respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before November 12, 2020. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on October 12, 2020. (Marienko, A.)
October 9, 2020 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until 11/12/2020 to Plead #1 Complaint by Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.. (O'Malley, Regen)
October 9, 2020 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Regen O'Malley on behalf of Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc. (O'Malley, Regen)
September 24, 2020 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Bento. Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc. served on 9/22/2020, answer due 10/13/2020. (Saluck, Jill)
September 18, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jill Raymond Saluck on behalf of Anthony Bento (Saluck, Jill)
September 17, 2020 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jill Raymond Saluck* *Saluck Halper & Lehrman PLLC* *75 S. Broadway Ste 400* *White Plains, NY 10601*. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
September 16, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Bento, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 09/16/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 09/16/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
September 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/16/2020 Discovery due by 3/19/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 4/23/2021 Signed by Clerk on 09/17/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) Modified on 9/17/2020 corrected file date (Nuzzi, Tiffany).
September 16, 2020 Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Oliver, T.)
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6099871.), filed by Anthony Bento.(Saluck, Jill)
September 16, 2020 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to The Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.. (Saluck, Jill)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bento v. Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aluminum Finishing Company, Inc.
Represented By: Kuuku Minnah-Donkoh
Represented By: Regen O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Bento
Represented By: Jill Raymond Saluck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?