Ritz v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak
Lorna Ritz |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak |
3:2020cv01416 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Defendant, National Railroad Passenger Corporation's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses with Jury Demand by National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak.(Dwyer, Paul) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Edwin Dwyer on behalf of National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak (Dwyer, Paul) |
Answer deadline updated for National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak to 10/14/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Anthony Serrette Resident Agent of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) on September 23, 2020, filed by Lorna Ritz. (Sheffy, Anthony) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *A. Alan Sheffy* *Sheffy Mazzaccaro DePaolo & Dunham* *166 N. Main St.* *Southington, CT 06489*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Lorna Ritz, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 09/22/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 09/21/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 09/21/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/20/2020 Discovery due by 3/23/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 4/27/2021 Signed by Clerk on 09/21/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6108434.), filed by Lorna Ritz.(Sheffy, A.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak. (Sheffy, A.) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ritz v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation - Amtrak | |
Represented By: | Paul Edwin Dwyer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lorna Ritz | |
Represented By: | A. Alan Sheffy |
Represented By: | Anthony Alan Sheffy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.