R. v. Saul
| Orlando R. |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv01419 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting Defendant's #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time until 1/22/2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 11/17/2020. (Nault, James)
|
|
Answer deadline updated to 1/22/2021 per Dkt. 12 Order. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until January 22, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support)(Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 10/23/2020. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Vanessa L. Bryant for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 10/23/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 9/22/2020 to edit text (Fazekas, J.).
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff, a minor, has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff's mother has completed the required information on plaintiff's behalf. See id. at 4. She asserts that plaintiff is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, because she has no employment income and minimal assets. See generally id. at 2-4. Plaintiff's mother also represents that she "receives Cash assistance from State of CT[,]" a "Section 8 voucher[,]" and "SNAP Benefits from DSS CT[.]" Id. at 2-4 (sic). At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/22/2020. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Orlando R.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by Orlando R..(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 9/22/2020 to correct filed against parties (Walker, J.).
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 11/23/2020. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
