Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Dennis Stewart
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2020cv01429
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Alvin W Thompson
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File the Electronic Certified Administrative Record (ECF No. #19 ) is hereby GRANTED to January 22, 2021. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 11/20/2020. (Mata, E.)
November 19, 2020 Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time until January 22, 2021for Filing of the Administrative Transcript by Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Walker, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE Providing Email Address by Dennis Stewart re #12 Consent to Electronic Notice, #13 MOTION for by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing Order (Oliver, T.)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Alvin W. Thompson for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 10/19/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam for MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing including #13 MOTION for by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing Order Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/16/2020.Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Jaiman, R.)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. The self-represented plaintiff has filed a #12 Consent to Electronic Notice and a #13 Motion by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing. Although plaintiff has largely completed each of these forms, he has failed to provide an email address in either form. See Doc. #12 at 1; Doc. #13 at 1. In order to receive electronic notice and to participate in electronic filing, plaintiff must provide the Court with a valid email address. Accordingly, on or before October 23, 2020, plaintiff shall re-file both the Consent to Electronic Notice form and the Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing form, including in each a valid email address. Failure to timely provide this information will result in the denial of both motions. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/6/2020. (Katz, S.)
October 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER. Plaintiff has filed two motions (using different forms) seeking to proceed without the payment of fees and costs, each of which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 , Doc. #11 . In each of those motions, plaintiff has sworn that he has no income and no assets. See generally id. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's Motions for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 , Doc. #11 ) are GRANTED. The Court also reminds plaintiff that pursuant to the Court's September 24, 2020, Order, he is to file a copy of the Appeals Council decision on or before October 16, 2020. See Doc. #8. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/6/2020. (Katz, S.)
October 6, 2020 Filing 13 MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Dennis Stewart. (Email Address was not listed on the form) (Oliver, T.)
October 6, 2020 Filing 12 Consent to Electronic Notice by Dennis Stewart (Email Address was not listed on the form) (Oliver, T.)
October 6, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dennis Stewart. (Oliver, T.)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
October 1, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Walker, Julia)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. So that the Court may determine whether plaintiff has properly exhausted his administrative remedies, on or before October 16, 2020, plaintiff shall file a copy of the Appeals Council decision that was allegedly issued on September 14, 2020. See Doc. #1 at 2. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/24/2020. (Katz, S.)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER. The self-represented plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed in this matter without the payment of fees and costs (Doc. #2 ). Plaintiff's motion has been filed using a "Short Form" that is generally not used in this District for cases involving the appeal of a Social Security disability determination. If plaintiff wishes to proceed in this matter without paying the applicable fees and costs, he must re-file his motion using the form motion utilized in this District for cases involving the appeal of a Social Security disability determination. A copy of that form motion is attached to this Order.Plaintiff shall re-file his motion on or before October 16, 2020, or this matter may be dismissed.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/24/2020. (Katz, S.)
September 23, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE TO SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES Signed by Clerk on 09/23/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dennis Stewart. (Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Dennis Stewart.(Fazekas, J.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/23/2020: #1 ADDED PDF - Envelope) (Fazekas, J.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Julia C. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dennis Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?