Madison v. Danbury Federal Correction Inst
Petitioner: Mark Madison
Respondent: Danbury Federal Correction Inst and Institution of Danbury Federal Correctional
Case Number: 3:2020cv01436
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Victor A Bolden
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2020 Filing fee received from Mark Madison: $ 5.00, receipt number CTXB00011667 (Payton, R.)
October 16, 2020 Filing 9 MOTION to Amend #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Mark Madison. Responses due by 11/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for initial review of the Petition #1 pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/13/2020.Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson.(Perez, J.)
October 6, 2020 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Mark Madison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.)
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER. The #5 Order to Show Cause shall not issue until the requisite filing fee is received by the Clerk of Court. The Clerk of Court is directed not to fulfill service until the fee is received. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/29/2020. (Millat, C.)
September 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Response due by October 30, 2020. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve this petition on respondent's representative by e-mail on or before October 2, 2020. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/25/2020. (Millat, C.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY RE: HABEAS CORPUS FILING FEE - payment or Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis required. Signed by Clerk on 09/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Compassionate Release, filed by Mark Madison.(Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madison v. Danbury Federal Correction Inst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Danbury Federal Correction Inst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Institution of Danbury Federal Correctional
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mark Madison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?