Williams v. Saul
Anthony Williams |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2020cv01493 |
September 30, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting on consent #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The Commissioner shall file the administrative record on or before January 29, 2021. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/23/2020. (D'Amato, Joseph) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until January 29, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Walker, Julia) |
Filing 9 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Kari A. Dooley for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 11/3/2020.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 8 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/15/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, as his monthly income, which supports plaintiff and his minor son, barely covers his monthly expenses. See generally id. at 2-4. Plaintiff also states that he receives Section 8 housing assistance. See id. at 3, 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED.The Court notes that plaintiff's motion was filed using a now-outdated version of the financial affidavit. The form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and accompanying affidavit were updated on September 17, 2020, and are available on the District's website. Going forward, counsel shall use that form motion and affidavit when her client seeks to commence an action without payment of fees and costs.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/1/2020. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/30/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/30/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER RE: SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/1/2020 to edit text (Fazekas, J.). |
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 11/30/2020. (Fazekas, J.) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Social Security Administration, filed by Anthony Williams.(Yelner, Olia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.