Glover v. HPC - Eight et al
| Lisa Glover |
| HPC - Eight, Building + Land Technology and Building & Land Technology |
| 3:2020cv01535 |
| October 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| William I Garfinkel |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for initial review of the Complaint #1 pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/20/2020.Motions referred to William I Garfinkel.(Perez, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/15/2020; Discovery due by 4/17/2021; Dispositive Motions due by 5/22/2021. Signed by Clerk on 10/13/2020.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Lisa Glover. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa Glover. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Building + Land Technology, HPC - Eight, filed by Lisa Glover. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
