Costa v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Brittany Costa |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation |
3:2020cv01536 |
October 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Federal Employer's Liability |
45 U.S.C. ยง 51 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 First Corporate Disclosure Statement by National Railroad Passenger Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Canadian Pacific Railway, Corporate Parent Berkshire Hathaway, Corporate Parent Burlington Northern & Santa Fe LLC, Corporate Parent Passenger Railroad Insurance Limited, Corporate Parent Washington Terminal Company, Corporate Parent American Premier Underwriters, Inc., Corporate Parent American Financial Group, Inc for National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Charkow, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with jury demand by National Railroad Passenger Corporation.(Charkow, Andrew) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *National Railroad Passenger Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *George J. Cahill, Jr.* *Cahill & Perry, P.C.* *43 Trumbull St.* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Brittany Costa, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 10/13/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/09/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/09/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/8/2020. Discovery due by 4/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 5/15/2021. Signed by Clerk on 10/09/2020. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Railroad Passenger Corporation ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6147670.), filed by Brittany Costa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cahill, George) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to National Railroad Passenger Corporation. (Cahill, George) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Costa v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: National Railroad Passenger Corporation | |
Represented By: | Andrew Brian Charkow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brittany Costa | |
Represented By: | George J. Cahill, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.