Pitman v. Saul
| Tanya Lynn Pitman |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv01554 |
| October 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set Deadlines: Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 1/18/2021. Plaintiff's Motion Reverse and/or Remand due 3/18/2021 and Defendant's Motion to Affirm the decision of the Commissioner due by 5/18/2021. (Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. The Commissioner shall file its answer and the administrative record on or before January 18, 2021. The Court further orders the Commissioner to produce a text-searchable version of the record on the same date as the certified record. This "searchable record" should contain identical images to the certified record as well as the certified record's table of contents and electronic tabs but need not be certified or comply with the PDF/A standard. This "searchable record" shall be understood as a supplemental submission to aid the Court and parties' review of the record, rather than a substitute for the certified record required by 42 U.S.C. 405(g); if there are conflicts, the certified record shall govern. Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse and/or Remand and supporting memorandum of law on or before March 18, 2021. The memorandum of law must explain the reasons why plaintiff believes the decision should be reversed or remanded for reconsideration, specifically addressing whether there was an error of law or a lack of substantial evidence to support the decision below. See, e.g., Greek v. Colvin, 802 F.3d 370, 374-75 (2d Cir. 2015) (per curiam). The Commissioner shall file its response or its Motion to Affirm the decision of the Commissioner on or before May 18, 2021. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of the Commissioner's response. The parties should consult the Court's Standing Scheduling Order for the requirements concerning content and format of briefing. Doc. #4 . Counsel should confer at the earliest practicable time if there will be an agreement to a voluntary remand and to filing of a joint motion for voluntary remand in lieu of full rounds of briefing. The Court will contact the parties shortly after filing of the Commissioner's response regarding a date for scheduling of oral argument. The parties are advised that the Court is unlikely to grant an extension of time of the dates as set forth in this scheduling order, and that failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order may result in a summary grant of relief for the opposing party. Any motion for extension of time must be filed at least 5 days in advance of the deadline that is due and must establish "good cause" with a particularized showing why the existing deadline could not be reasonably met despite the diligence of the party seeking an extension of time in accordance with the requirements of D. Conn. Local Civ. R. 7(b). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 11/17/2020. (Johnson, R.)
|
|
Filing 11
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/16/2020.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/30/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Walker, Julia)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/14/2020. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/14/2020. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/14/2020. (Attachments: #1 consent form) (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 12/13/2020. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has not been employed since 2010 and has no assets. See Doc. #2 at 3-4. Plaintiff receives approximately $861 in TANF and SNAP/EBT benefits each month to support herself and her daughter. See id. at 3. The family's monthly expenses are $861.69. See id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/14/2020. (Weis, Anne)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with supporting financial affidavit by Tanya Lynn Pitman. (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tanya Lynn Pitman. (Attachments: #1 Supplement notice of appeals council action)(Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
