Stephens v. Saul
Plaintiff: Luz M. Stephens
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2020cv01573
Filed: October 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Referring Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 1, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/16/2020. (Lewis, D)
December 15, 2020 Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 1, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support)(Fitzhugh, Nicol)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Janet C. Hall for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
October 28, 2020 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
October 20, 2020 Filing fee received from Plaintiff: $ 400.00, receipt number CTXN00022149 (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/19/2020. (Reis, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/19/2020. (Reis, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/19/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Luz M. Stephens (Reis, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Luz M. Stephens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Julia)
October 19, 2020 Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 12/18/2020. (Reis, Julia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stephens v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Nicol Fitzhugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luz M. Stephens
Represented By: Ivan Michael Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?