Coleman v. Saul
| Allen Coleman |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2020cv01588 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting Respondent's #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to file the Certified Administrative Record until 02/20/2021. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/16/2020. (Nault, James)
|
|
Answer deadline updated to 2/20/2021 per Dkt. 12 Order. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 11
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 20, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support)(Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 11/16/2020. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case is reassigned to Judge Vanessa L. Bryant for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2020.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Docs. #2 , #2 -1. Plaintiff has not been employed since the "early 2000s" and has no assets beyond $5.00 in a bank account. See Doc. #2 -1 at 3-4. Plaintiff "lives with his cousin. His cousin and family pay for rent and help him in paying phone and personal care items." Id. at 4. Plaintiff reports that his monthly expenditure on food is $194.00, paid for by "SNAP Benefits DSS CT[.]" Id. at 3-4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 10/23/2020. (Weis, Anne)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/22/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Allen Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Social Security Administration, filed by Allen Coleman.(Yelner, Olia)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 12/21/2020. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
