Kail v. Monsanto Company
| Mr. Daniel R. Kail and Daniel R. Kail |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2020cv01596 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Acknowledgment of Receipt re: Case Transferred Out - Case transferred from Connecticut has been opened in California Northern District as case 3:20-cv-08170, filed 11/19/2020. (Oliver, T.) |
| Case electronically transferred to the Northern District of California. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 9 MDL Transfer Order. Case transferred to the Northern District of California. (signed by Clerk [John W. Nichols], MDL Panel.) Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) Modified on 11/17/2020 corrected file date (Nuzzi, Tiffany). |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Answer deadline updated for Monsanto Company to 11/19/2020. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint served on Monsanto Company on October 29, 2020, filed by Daniel R. Kail. (Leaf, Samuel) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Monsanto Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Samuel M. Leaf* *The Law Office of Samuel M. Leaf* *1 Cross Brook Lane* *Westport, CT 06880*. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Exhibit filed by Daniel R. Kail, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Daniel R. Kail Signed by Clerk on 10/23/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet by Daniel R. Kail re #1 Complaint. (Leaf, Samuel) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/22/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/22/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/21/2020 Discovery due by 4/23/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 5/28/2021 Signed by Clerk on 10/22/2020.(Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6175274.), filed by Daniel R. Kail.(Leaf, Samuel) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Monsanto Company. (Leaf, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
