Saah v. Levine
Plaintiff: Faris Saah
Defendant: Vanessa D Levine and Vanesa D Levine
Case Number: 3:2020cv01682
Filed: November 9, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Vanesa D Levine.Responses due by 1/28/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Rudzik, Keith)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 18 RESPONSE re #15 Objection filed by Faris Saah. (Williams, John)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER denying #11 Motion for Default Judgment; granting #14 Motion to Set Aside Default in light of the Defendant's appearance and pursuant to Rule 55(c), for good cause shown. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/30/20. (Dooley, Kari)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OBJECTION re #11 MOTION for Default Judgment as to defendant Levine filed by Vanesa D Levine. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Objection)(Rudzik, Keith)
December 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OBJECTION re #13 Amended Complaint filed by Vanesa D Levine. (Rudzik, Keith)
December 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION to Set Aside Default by Vanessa D Levine. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Vacate, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Rudzik, Keith)
December 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Vanessa D Levine, filed by Faris Saah.(Williams, John)
December 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith R. Rudzik on behalf of Vanessa D Levine (Rudzik, Keith)
December 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Default Judgment as to defendant Levine by Faris Saah. (Williams, John)
December 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Default Entry 55(a) Motion for default judgment due by 1/16/2021. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed by the Clerk pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Signed by Clerk on 12/17/2020. (Gould, K.)
December 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to defendant Levine by Faris Saah. (Williams, John)
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Faris Saah. Vanessa D Levine served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Attachments: #1 Marshal Return)(Williams, John)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Vanessa D Levine* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John R. Williams* *51 Elm St., Ste. 409* *New Haven, CT 06510* (Fazekas, J.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Notice of Appearance filed by John R. Williams on behalf of Faris Saah, #1 Complaint filed by Faris Saah, #5 Standing Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 11/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Discovery due by 5/11/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 6/15/2021. Signed by Clerk on 11/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John R. Williams on behalf of Faris Saah (Williams, John)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vanessa D Levine ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6210358.), filed by Faris Saah.(Williams, John) Modified on 11/9/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.)
November 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Vanessa D Levine. (Williams, John) Modified on 11/9/2020 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saah v. Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanessa D Levine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vanesa D Levine
Represented By: Keith R. Rudzik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Faris Saah
Represented By: John R. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?