Alamo v. Burris Logistics, Inc.
Isaac Alamo |
Burris Logistics, Inc. |
3:2020cv01752 |
November 23, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert N Chatigny |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Holly L. Cini on behalf of Burris Logistics, Inc. (Cini, Holly) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sara R. Simeonidis on behalf of Burris Logistics, Inc. (Simeonidis, Sara) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/2/2020. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Burris Logistics, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael C. McMinn* *The McMinn Employment Law Firm, LLC* *1000 Lafayette Blvd., Suite 1100* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Burris Logistics, Inc. waiver sent on 11/24/2020, answer due 1/23/2021 filed by Isaac Alamo. (McMinn, Michael) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Burris Logistics, Inc.. (McMinn, Michael) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Notice, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Isaac Alamo, #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 11/23/2020. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 5 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 11/23/2020. (Attachments: #1 Identification of Initial Discovery Protocol for Employment Cases) (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/23/2020. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/23/2020. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/22/2021, Discovery due by 5/25/2021, Dispositive Motions due by 6/29/2021. Signed by Clerk on 11/23/2020. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Burris Logistics, Inc. ( Filing fee $400 receipt number ACTDC-6238069.), filed by Isaac Alamo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(McMinn, Michael) |
Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Alamo v. Burris Logistics, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Burris Logistics, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Holly L. Cini |
Represented By: | Sara R. Simeonidis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Isaac Alamo | |
Represented By: | Michael C. McMinn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.