Genao v. New York County Family Court
Antonio Genao |
New York County Family Court |
3:2020cv01829 |
December 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
William I Garfinkel |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER adopting #8 Recommended Ruling. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Ruling concerning #1 the Complaint. The Recommended Ruling contains an accurate statement of the applicable law and a thoroughly reasoned analysis and application of that law to the circumstances presented here. The Recommended Ruling therefore is Accepted, Adopted and So Ordered. Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommended Ruling. Accordingly, the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/08/2021. (Gould, K.) |
Filing 8 RECOMMENDED RULING denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antonio Genao. For the reasons set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Undersigned recommends that Plaintiff's #1 complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). 9 Pages. Objections due by 12/30/2020.The Clerk of the Court will mail a copy of this Recommended Ruling to the pro se Plaintiff and make a notation on the docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I Garfinkel on 12/15/20. |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for the reasons set forth in a Recommended Ruling filed 12/16/20. Signed by Magistrate Judge William I Garfinkel on 12/16/20. (Esposito, A.) |
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge William I Garfinkel for ruling on motion #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/14/2020.Motion referred to William I Garfinkel(Gould, K.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2021. Discovery due by 6/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 7/15/2021. Signed by Clerk on 12/9/2020.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Antonio Genao. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against New York County Family Court, filed by Antonio Genao. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Genao v. New York County Family Court | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Antonio Genao | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: New York County Family Court | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.