Piccerillo v. Saul
Lisa Piccerillo |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2020cv01878 |
December 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. § 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time until April 16, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)Motions referred to Thomas O. Farrish(Walker, Julia) |
Filing 9 Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish for all purposes including issuing a recommended ruling. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 1/25/2021.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia) |
|
|
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 2/15/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa Piccerillo. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul filed by Lisa Piccerillo.(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 12/17/2020 to correct filed against parties (Walker, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.