Lebron v. Mrzyglod
Angel D. Lebron, Jr. and Angel D. Lebron |
C.O. Ryan A. Kelly, C.O. Ryder S. Bader, Brian Fischer, Sgt. Michael F. Mrzyglod, C.O. William J. Williams, Albert Prack, Clifford K. Gunselt, Hearing Officer B. Levine, C.O. Barry A. Stevens, Supt. W. Lee and Michael F. Mrzyglod |
Dr. Joseph Santoro and Joseph Santoro |
3:2020mc00037 |
May 15, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Vanessa L Bryant |
Other |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER denying #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena as moot, absent objection. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 06/04/2020.(Nault, James) |
Filing 5 Letter from Diego O. Barros, Esq., dated May 21, 2020. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5/15/2020. (Velez, F.) |
Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Taruna Garg on behalf of Joseph Santoro (Garg, Taruna) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul E. Knag on behalf of Joseph Santoro (Knag, Paul) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena (paid $47 fee; receipt number ACTDC-5861111), filed by Joseph Santoro.Responses due by 6/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Subpoena, #2 Exhibit Email, #3 Exhibit Letter Dated April 1, 2020)(Knag, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.