Humeniuk v. Saul
Plaintiff: Kathleen Marie Humeniuk
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2021cv00059
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Referring Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Certified Administrative Record shall be due on or before May 14, 2021. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/10/2021. (Banker, Joshua)
March 10, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 14, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Walker, Julia)
February 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF TRANSFER: Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, the case reassigned to Judge Kari A. Dooley for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 2/24/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
February 4, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Walker, Julia)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/15/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/15/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
January 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6330632.), filed by Kathleen Marie Humeniuk.(Skuret, Daniel) Modified on 1/15/2021 to correct filed against party(Walker, J.).
January 15, 2021 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Oliver, T.)
January 15, 2021 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Commissioner of Social Security. (Skuret, Daniel)
January 15, 2021 Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 3/15/2021. (Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Humeniuk v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Julia C. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Marie Humeniuk
Represented By: Daniel D. Skuret
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?