Rodgers v. New London et al
Plaintiff: Cornelius Rodgers
Defendant: City of New London and New London Police Department
Case Number: 3:2021cv00111
Filed: January 26, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Rule 16 Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2021 11:30 AM before Judge Stefan R. Underhill. The call-in for the conference is 888.636.3807; when prompted for the access code, dial 650 8043 followed by #. (If asked whether to join the conference as the host, bypass that option by dialing #.). (Simon, K.)
March 15, 2021 Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Howard, Claire)
March 8, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of New London Police Department by Cornelius Rodgers (Howard, Claire)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/5/2021. (Simon, K.)
March 4, 2021 Filing 14 Second MOTION for Extension of Time until 14 days after Amended Complaint is filed to Respond to Complaint #1 Complaint by City of New London, New London Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Smith, Elizabeth)
February 26, 2021 Answer deadline updated for City of New London and New London Police Department to 3/4/2021. (Barry, Donna)
February 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time until March 4, 2021 to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/26/2021. (Simon, K.)
February 25, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Claire M. Howard on behalf of Cornelius Rodgers (Howard, Claire)
February 25, 2021 Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 4, 2021 to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Complaint by City of New London, New London Police Department. (Smith, Elizabeth)
February 2, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Mott Smith on behalf of City of New London, New London Police Department (Smith, Elizabeth)
January 29, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Johanna G. Zelman on behalf of City of New London, New London Police Department (Zelman, Johanna)
January 29, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cornelius Rodgers. All Defendants. (Parenteau, Jacques)
January 27, 2021 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of New London, New London Police Department* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jacques J. Parenteau* *Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau, LLC-NL* *105 Huntington St., PO Box 1631* *New London, CT 06320*. (Fazekas, J.)
January 27, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Cornelius Rodgers, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Notice Re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 01/27/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 26, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 01/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Form, #2 Initial Discovery Protocols Order)(Fazekas, J.)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/27/2021. Discovery due by 7/28/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2021. Signed by Clerk on 01/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
January 26, 2021 Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
January 26, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6349449.), filed by Cornelius Rodgers.(Parenteau, Jacques)
January 26, 2021 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Parenteau, Jacques)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodgers v. New London et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cornelius Rodgers
Represented By: Jacques J. Parenteau
Represented By: Claire M. Howard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New London
Represented By: Elizabeth Mott Smith
Represented By: Johanna G. Zelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New London Police Department
Represented By: Elizabeth Mott Smith
Represented By: Johanna G. Zelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?