Vega-Colon v. Eulizier et al
Jose Vega-Colon |
Town of Wethersfield, John Does and Layau Eulizier |
3:2021cv00175 |
February 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Yale on behalf of Layau Eulizier (Yale, David) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Elliot B. Spector on behalf of Layau Eulizier (Spector, Elliot) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting on consent #13 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/22/2021. (Cahill, Leslie) |
Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time until April 30, 2021 Time to Plead #1 Complaint by John Does, Town of Wethersfield. (Maccini, Kristan) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas R. Gerarde on behalf of John Does, Town of Wethersfield (Gerarde, Thomas) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristan M. Maccini on behalf of John Does, Town of Wethersfield (Maccini, Kristan) |
Answer deadline updated to 4/30/2021 for Town of Wethersfield, John Does. (Cahill, Leslie) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Jose Vega-Colon re #1 Complaint , AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Sue Schroeder, Authorized on 2/24/2021, filed by Jose Vega-Colon. (Valenzuela, Eric) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Dale K. Galipo; granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Eric Valenzuela. Signed by Clerk on 3/1/2021. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) Eric Valenzuela to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6409419) by Jose Vega-Colon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Eric Valenzuela)(Jefferson, Michael) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Dale K. Galipo to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6409401) by Jose Vega-Colon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Dale K. Galipo)(Jefferson, Michael) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *John Does, Layau Eulizier, Town of Wethersfield* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael A. Jefferson* *Law Office of Michael A. Jefferson* *575 Main Street* *East Haven, CT 06512*. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Jose Vega-Colon, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 02/11/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 02/10/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 02/10/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/11/2021. Discovery due by 8/12/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 9/16/2021. Signed by Clerk on 02/10/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6377743.), filed by Jose Vega-Colon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jefferson, Michael) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Jefferson, Michael) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.