McCarthy v. Norton et al
| John J. McCarthy |
| John Doe, Norton, Maria D. Summer and Kelly M Barrett |
| 3:2021cv00198 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The motion for leave to file #1 is denied without prejudice. To commence an action, the plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. 1914(a) (requiring parties to pay filing fee to commence action) and 1915(a) (person may be excused from prepayment of filing fee by seeking leave to proceed in formal pauperis) Mr. McCarthy is directed to either pay the fee or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by March 23, 2021. Plaintiff also must file a motion for leave to file due to the injunction against him. Failure to respond to this order within 21 days of this order will result in the dismissal of the case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/23/21. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 2/18/2021. (Reis, Julia)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File by John J. McCarthy. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
