Mendez v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc.
| Carmen Mendez |
| Crothall Healthcare, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00202 |
| February 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2612 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/05/21(Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Carmen Mendez.Responses due by 3/12/2021 (Reilly, Michael) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Notice of Statement regarding Removed Case filed by Crothall Healthcare, Inc., #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Notice of Pending Motions filed by Crothall Healthcare, Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Elizabeth R. McKenna on behalf of Crothall Healthcare, Inc., #6 Electronic Filing Order, #7 Standing Protective Order, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Crothall Healthcare, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 02/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/18/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/18/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/19/2021 Discovery due by 8/20/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 9/24/2021 Signed by Clerk on 02/18/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Crothall Healthcare, Inc. of Pending Motions (McKenna, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Crothall Healthcare, Inc. of Statement regarding Removed Case (McKenna, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth R. McKenna on behalf of Crothall Healthcare, Inc. (McKenna, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Crothall Healthcare, Inc. from Superior Court, case number HHD-CV21-6138129-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6391771, filed by Crothall Healthcare, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(McKenna, Elizabeth) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendez v. Crothall Healthcare, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carmen Mendez | |
| Represented By: | Michael John Reilly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Crothall Healthcare, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth R. McKenna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
