Daigle v. Saul
| Leila Daigle |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00218 |
| February 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/12/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
| Set Deadlines: Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 6/8/2021; Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse and/or Remand due by 8/9/21; Defendant's Motion to Affirm the decision of the Commissioner due by 10/8/2021. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
|
Filing 11
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. The Commissioner shall file its answer and the administrative record on or before June 8, 2021. The Court further orders the Commissioner to produce a text-searchable version of the record on the same date as the certified record. This "searchable record" should contain identical images to the certified record as well as the certified record's table of contents and electronic tabs but need not be certified or comply with the PDF/A standard. This "searchable record" shall be understood as a supplemental submission to aid the Court and parties' review of the record, rather than a substitute for the certified record required by 42 U.S.C. 405(g); if there are conflicts, the certified record shall govern. Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse and/or Remand and supporting memorandum of law on or before August 9, 2021. The memorandum of law must explain the reasons why plaintiff believes the decision should be reversed or remanded for reconsideration, specifically addressing whether there was an error of law or a lack of substantial evidence to support the decision below. See, e.g., Greek v. Colvin, 802 F.3d 370, 374-75 (2d Cir. 2015) (per curiam). The Commissioner shall file its response or its Motion to Affirm the decision of the Commissioner on or before October 8, 2021. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of the Commissioner's response. The parties should file briefing with appropriate citations to the record but are excused from any requirement to file a separate material statement of facts. Counsel should confer at the earliest practicable time if there will be an agreement to a voluntary remand and to filing of a joint motion for voluntary remand in lieu of full rounds of briefing. The Court will contact the parties shortly after filing of the Commissioner's response regarding a date for scheduling of oral argument. The parties are advised that the Court is unlikely to grant an extension of time of the dates as set forth in this scheduling order, and that failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order may result in a summary grant of relief for the opposing party. Any motion for extension of time must be filed at least 5 days in advance of the deadline that is due and must establish "good cause" with a particularized showing why the existing deadline could not be reasonably met despite the diligence of the party seeking an extension of time in accordance with the requirements of D. Conn. Local Civ. R. 7(b). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/9/2021. (DeBot, B.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case is reassigned to Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 4/8/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Everhart Kristin on behalf of Social Security Administration (Kristin, Everhart) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff reports that she is not currently employed, and that she receives child support, TANF benefits, and "Food Stamps" monthly. Id. at 3. Plaintiff further asserts that she owns no assets and has minimal cash on hand. See id. at 3-4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/23/2021. (Weis, Anne)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 02/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leila Daigle. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Leila Daigle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fazekas, J.) |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 4/23/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
