Casanova v. Saul
Norberto Casanova |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2021cv00309 |
March 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time. Any motions for further extensions of this deadline must, in addition to complying with Local Rule 7 in all respects, be accompanied by a then-current statement of the Commissioner's efforts to produce the certified administrative record in this case, as opposed to his efforts to produce records generally. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 05/05/2021. (Farrish, Thomas) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 9, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Walker, Julia) |
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Norberto Casanova, Andrew M. Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/25/2021.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Norberto Casanova Notice, Consent & Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
Filing 8 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/9/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/9/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.) |
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 5/10/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs because his monthly SSI benefits just cover his monthly expenses. See generally id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that he receives "Food Stamps[.]" Id. at 3. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/9/2021. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Norberto Casanova. (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Norberto Casanova.(Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.