Thomas, et al v. Auriemma
Sarah O'Hare and Michael Thomas |
Joseph G. Auriemma |
3:2021cv00322 |
March 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with jury demand by Joseph G. Auriemma.(Lerman, Lewis) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Lewis S. Lerman on behalf of Joseph G. Auriemma (Lerman, Lewis) |
![]() |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO COUNSEL IN TRANSFERRED CASE. Signed by Clerk on 3/15/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 17 NOTICE: ANY MOTIONS PENDING AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER MUST BE REFILED IN OUR DISTRICT. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 3/10/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 3/10/2021.(Freberg, B) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 Case electronically transferred in from District of New York Southern; Case Number 7:20-cv-10596. Modified on 3/11/2021 TO CORRECT THE DATE FILED (Oliver, T.). |
![]() |
CASE TRANSFERRED OUT ELECTRONICALLY from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States District Court - District of District of Connecticut.(ks) |
Filing 10 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER. Document filed by Sarah O'Hare, Michael Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order).(O'Dell, Kevin) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip M. Halpern: Pre-Motion Conference held on February 24, 2021. Counsel for all parties appeared by telephone. As stated on the record, on or before March 3, 2021, Plaintiffs shall file either a letter advising that they maintain that this Court properly has personal jurisdiction over Defendant or a joint Order for this Court's approval, on consent, transferring this case to either the District of Connecticut or the District of New Jersey. As further stated on the record, Defendant is granted leave to move for dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction. The parties shall serve and file their papers in accordance with the following schedule: (1) Defendant's moving papers shall be served, not filed, on 03/10/2021; (2) Plaintiffs' opposition shall be served, not filed, on 03/24/2021; and (3) Defendant's reply shall be served on 03/31/2021. The parties are directed to file all motion documents on the reply date, 03/31/2021. The Court reminds the parties that motion papers must comply with all applicable rules, including Local Civil Rule 7.1 of the Local Rules of the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. (gpb) |
![]() |
Filing 8 LETTER addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Kevin D. O'Dell, Esq. dated January 25, 2021 re: pre-motion conference. Document filed by Sarah O'Hare, Michael Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Accident Information Summary, #2 Exhibit Letter from MDAF dated 1/11/21).(O'Dell, Kevin) |
Filing 7 LETTER addressed to Judge Philip M. Halpern from Gail S. Karan, Esq. dated January 22, 2021 re: Pre-Motion Conference. Document filed by Joseph G. Auriemma..(Karan, Gail) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gail Susan Karan on behalf of Joseph G. Auriemma..(Karan, Gail) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Joseph G. Auriemma..(gp) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Philip M. Halpern. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Joseph G. Auriemma, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Sarah O'Hare, Michael Thomas..(O'Dell, Kevin) |
Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Sarah O'Hare, Michael Thomas..(O'Dell, Kevin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(O'Dell, Kevin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph G. Auriemma. (Filing Fee $ 402.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-23061982)Document filed by Michael Thomas, Sarah O'Hare..(O'Dell, Kevin) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO FILE CIVIL INITIAL PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Kevin D. O'Dell to electronically file the initial pleading in this case. Failure to file the initial pleading may result in the dismissal of the case pursuant to Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131. Initial Pleading due by 12/21/2020. (sj) |
***Attorney Kevin D. O'Dell for Sarah O'Hare,Kevin D. O'Dell for Michael Thomas added. (sj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.