Bellemare v. Saul
| Ronald Bellemare |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00381 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Michael P Shea |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER. The (ECF No. #10 ) motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant shall file the Certified Administrative Record by July 17, 2021. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/13/2021. (Gait, Emily)
|
| Certified Administrative Record deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 7/17/2021. (Johnson, D.) |
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 17, 2021 to file the ECAR by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of the Executive Director of the Social Security Administration's Office of Appellate Operations)(Everhart, Kristin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Judge Michael P. Shea for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 4/22/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Everhart Kristin on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Kristin, Everhart) Modified on 3/30/2021 to correct party (Anastasio, F.). |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 03/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no employment income, no assets and outstanding debt. See generally id. at 3-5. Plaintiff also states that his wife's disability benefits just cover the family's monthly expenses, and that he receives "food stamps[.]" Id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/19/2021. (Katz, S.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Bellemare. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Ronald Bellemare.(Yelner, Olia) Modified on 3/19/2021 to correct filed against parties(Hushin, Z.). |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 5/18/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
