D.B. Structured Products, Inc v. Savvidis
| D.B. Structured Products, Inc |
| Anastasios Savvidis |
| 3:2021cv00388 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER denying without prejudice #9 Motion for Extension of Time. The motion for an extension of time is denied without prejudice to renewal following the Court's ruling on the pending motion to remand. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 04/21/2021. (Millat, C.)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 18, 2021 by Anastasios Savvidis. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 8 OBJECTION re #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Anastasios Savvidis. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by D.B. Structured Products, Inc.Responses due by 4/27/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Cooke, Crystal) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/18/2021. Discovery due by 9/18/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 10/23/2021. Signed by Clerk on 03/19/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anastasios Savvidis. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Anastasios Savvidis from Superior Court-Stamford, case number FST-CV11-6009163-S., filed by Anastasios Savvidis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: D.B. Structured Products, Inc v. Savvidis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Anastasios Savvidis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: D.B. Structured Products, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Crystal L Cooke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
