Burrell v. Quiros et al
| William LaMar Burrell |
| Ingrid Feder, Robert Martin, Yvonne Marceau, Janine Brennan, Angel Quiros, Michelle King and Kara Phillips |
| 3:2021cv00393 |
| March 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ingrid Feder* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *William LaMar Burrell #430383* *CORRIGAN-RADGOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER* *986 Norwich-New London Turnpike* *Uncasville, CT 06382*. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP, IRO, Standing Order Re: Initial Discovery, Admin Directive reviewed and brought to the USM Office in Bridgeport for in-person service on defendant Dr. Ingrid Feder. Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 6/9/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 11
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Yvonne Marceau waiver sent on 4/6/2021, answer due 6/5/2021 filed by William LaMar Burrell. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ingrid Feder, Yvonne Marceau* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *William LaMar Burrell #430383* *CORRIGAN-RADGOWSKI CORRECTIONAL CENTER* *986 Norwich-New London Turnpike* *Uncasville, CT 06382*. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Dr. Ingrid Feder, Yvonne Marceau on 4/6/2021 by William LaMar Burrell. Waiver of Service due by 5/11/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP, IRO, Standing Order re: Discovery, Admin Directive reviewed and brought to the USM Office in Bridgeport for service on defendants Dr. Ingrid Feder, Yvonne Marceau. Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 4/26/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 9
Standing Order Re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/5/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. See attached Order. Discovery due by 11/2/2021; Dispositive Motions due by 12/2/2021. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/2/2021.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/29/21. (Payton, R.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 03/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 03/22/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William LaMar Burrell. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William LaMar Burrell. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Janine Brennan, Ingrid Feder, Michelle King, Yvonne Marceau, Robert Martin, Kara Phillips, Angel Quiros, filed by William LaMar Burrell.(Fazekas, J.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
