Saunders v. Busha et al
| William Saunders |
| John Doe and Busha |
| 3:2021cv00472 |
| April 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Saunders' motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/28/2021. (Rosenberg, J.)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William Saunders. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 Ledger Sheet. You must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 5/7/2021 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/16/21.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 04/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Saunders. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by William Saunders.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
