Torres v. Saul
Plaintiff: Julio Torres
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2021cv00479
Filed: April 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2021 Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 8/6/2021. (Blue, A.)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 consent motion for extension of time until 8/6/2021 to file the certified administrative record. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 6/2/2021. (Fries, J.)
June 1, 2021 Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until August 6, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Walker, Julia)
May 6, 2021 Filing 7 Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for all purposes including issuing a Recommended Ruling. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/6/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
April 13, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Walker, Julia)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
April 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/6/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
April 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6460250.), filed by Julio Torres.(Spat, Meryl) Modified on 4/6/2021 to correct parties (Anastasio, F.).
April 6, 2021 Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 6/7/2021. (Fazekas, J.)
April 6, 2021 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Torres v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Julia C. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julio Torres
Represented By: Meryl Anne Spat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?