Federle v. High Watch Recovery Center, Inc.
Julia Federle |
High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. |
3:2021cv00489 |
April 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Siddharth Sinha on behalf of High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. (Sinha, Siddharth) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. waiver sent on 4/12/2021, answer due 6/11/2021 filed by Julia Federle. (Munro-Delotto, Paige) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jody N. Cappello on behalf of High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. (Cappello, Jody) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *High Watch Recovery Center, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Paige Alexandra Munro-Delotto* *Munro-Delotto Law LLC* *400 Westminster Street, Suite 200* *Providence, RI 02903*. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Notice, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Julia Federle, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 4/12/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel Re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 4/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Freberg, B) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/8/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/8/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/7/2021; Discovery due by 10/8/2021; Dispositive Motions due by 11/12/2021. Signed by Clerk on 4/8/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HIGH WATCH RECOVERY CENTER, INC. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6463414.), filed by JULIA FEDERLE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Munro-Delotto, Paige) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. (Munro-Delotto, Paige) Modified on 4/8/2021 to edit text (Walker, J.). |
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Federle v. High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: High Watch Recovery Center, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jody N. Cappello |
Represented By: | Siddharth Sinha |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Julia Federle | |
Represented By: | Paige Alexandra Munro-Delotto |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.