Bank of the West v. Ramkrupa, LLC et al
| Bank of the West |
| Ramkrupa, LLC, Umesh D. Patel and Amita Patel |
| 3:2021cv00495 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/4/21. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/4/21. (Barry, Donna)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Amita Patel, Umesh D. Patel and Ramkrupa, LLC to 6/18/2021. (Barry, Donna) |
|
GENERAL SCHEDULING ORDER. The parties' Rule 26(f) Planning Report (Doc. #16 ) is hereby APPROVED as modified by this order. All discovery shall be completed by 10/15/21, and all other interim discovery dates set forth in the parties' Rule 26(f) Report are hereby adopted. Any dispositive summary judgment motions shall be filed by 11/15/21, and any response to dispositive summary judgment motions shall be filed by 12/15/21. The parties' joint trial memorandum is due by 11/15/21, or within 30 days of the Court's ruling on dispositive summary judgment motions, whichever date is later. The Court will thereafter set a trial date, and the parties should be prepared to proceed to jury selection within 30 days of the filing of the joint trial memorandum. Please refer to Judge Meyer's webpage on the District of Connecticut website for Judge Meyer's "Instructions for Discovery Disputes" and "Instructions for Joint Trial Memorandum" and "Pretrial Preferences" and "Trial Preferences." The parties are encouraged to commence discovery forthwith and to arrange their schedules in contemplation of the briefing deadlines for any dispositive motions, because the Court is unlikely to grant a future request for an extension of the scheduling order absent extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances. A telephonic status conference will be held on 7/15/21 at 4:00 p.m. Parties are instructed to call 877-402-9753 and use access code 8576007# to participate. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/04/2021 (Barry, Donna) Modified formatting on 6/6/2021 (Barry, Donna).
|
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 6/18/2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Amita Patel, Umesh D. Patel, Ramkrupa, LLC. (Seifert, Conrad) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Bank of the West.(Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 13 Supplemental SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bank of the West. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bank of the West. Amita Patel served on 4/22/2021, answer due 6/12/2021; Umesh D. Patel served on 4/22/2021, answer due 6/12/2021; Ramkrupa, LLC served on 4/22/2021, answer due 6/12/2021. (Goldman, Irve) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 First MOTION for Extension of Time until June 12, 2021 to Answer Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/7/2021. (Freberg, B)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Amita Patel to 6/12/2021; Umesh D. Patel to 6/12/2021; Ramkrupa, LLC to 6/12/2021. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time until June 12, 2021 Answer to Complaint by Amita Patel, Umesh D. Patel, Ramkrupa, LLC. (Seifert, Conrad) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Conrad O. Seifert on behalf of Amita Patel, Umesh D. Patel, Ramkrupa, LLC (Seifert, Conrad) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Amita Patel, Umesh D. Patel, Ramkrupa, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Irve J. Goldman* *Pullman & Comley* *850 Main St., PO Box 7006* *Bridgeport, CT 06601*. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Protective Order, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Bank of the West, #1 Complaint filed by Bank of the West, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bank of the West, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 4/12/2021.(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/9/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/9/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/8/2021 Discovery due by 10/9/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 11/13/2021 Signed by Clerk on 4/9/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Irve J. Goldman on behalf of Bank of the West (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of the West identifying Corporate Parent BNP Paribas for Bank of the West. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6465756.), filed by Bank of the West. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldman, Irve) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Goldman, Irve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
