Stanley v. USA
Arthur Stanley |
USA |
3:2021cv00536 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to the government's memorandum in opposition to the motion to vacate (Doc. #1 ). Petitioner Stanley's reply is due on or before August 21, 2021 Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/15/21. (Barry, Donna) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply to #7 Memorandum in Opposition to #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) by Arthur Stanley. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 8 ORDER. Petitioner may file any reply to the Government's memorandum in opposition to the motion for post-conviction relief #7 by June 22, 2021. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 06/02/21.(Barry, Donna) |
Filing 7 Memorandum in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Document #6 corrected. filed by USA. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 6 ENTERED IN ERROR - MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Response by USA. (Gresham, Kenneth) Modified on 6/1/2021 (Freberg, B). |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth L. Gresham on behalf of USA (Gresham, Kenneth) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is hereby ORDERED that the respondent file a response or objection on or before May 28, 2021 why the relief prayed for in the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence should not be granted. Any reply shall be filed by the petitioner by June 28, 2021. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and any supporting papers, on respondent's representative, the United States Attorney, care of John B. Hughes, by e-mail on or before April 20, 2021. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/23/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/19/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/19/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). by Arthur Stanley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice of Timely Filing, #3 Envelope, #4 Judgment from criminal case)(Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Stanley v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Arthur Stanley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | John B. Hughes |
Represented By: | Sarah P. Karwan |
Represented By: | Peter S. Jongbloed |
Represented By: | John H. Durham |
Represented By: | Kenneth L. Gresham |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.