Tift v. Saul
| Leroy E Tift, III |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00547 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Michael P Shea |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER. The #10 motion for extension is hereby GRANTED. The Commissioner shall file the certified administrative record by August 10, 2021.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/16/2021. (Super, John)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until August 20, 2021 for Filing the Administrative Transcript by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Walker, Julia) |
| Certified Administrative Record deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 8/10/2021. (Johnson, D.) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Judge Michael P. Shea for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 6/7/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/18/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew Saul (Walker, Julia) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no personal income, no assets and outstanding debt. See generally id. at 2-5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court notes that plaintiff's motion was filed using a now-outdated version of the motion and financial affidavit. The form motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and accompanying affidavit were updated on September 17, 2020, and are available on the District's website. Going forward, counsel shall use that form motion and affidavit when his client seeks to commence an action without payment of fees and costs. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/20/2021. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/20/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/20/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 04/20/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Leroy E Tift, III. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Daddario, Paul) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filed by Leroy E Tift, III.(Daddario, Paul) Modified on 4/20/2021 to correct text (Anastasio, F.). |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 6/21/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
