Torres v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Lauren Torres |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
3:2021cv00563 |
April 23, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Jeffrey A Meyer |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Memorandum in Support re #18 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A..Responses due by 7/5/2021 (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/2/21. (Barry, Donna) |
Answer deadline updated for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to 6/14/2021. (Barry, Donna) |
Filing 16 Second MOTION for Extension of Time until June 14, 2021(Assented-To) to File Responsive Pleading by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time until May 31, 2021 to File Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/29/2021. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
Answer deadline updated for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to 5/31/2021. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
Filing 14 Amended MOTION for Extension of Time until May 31, 2021 to File Responsive Pleading by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 13 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Doc. #7 ). The Court DENIES without prejudice defendant's motion for extension of time (Doc. #[7)]. The motion states that "[u]ndersigned counsel has inquired of Plaintiff's counsel, but has been unable to ascertain her position with respect to this motion. Doc. #7 at 2. This statement does not satisfy the requirement of D. Conn. Local Rule 7(b) which requires that a motion for extension of time either state the position of opposing counsel or state that "despite diligent effort, including making the inquiry in sufficient time to afford non-movant a reasonable opportunity to respond, the movant cannot ascertain the position(s) of the non-movant(s)." The motion fails to state any facts suggesting diligent effort or that plaintiff's counsel was allowed a sufficient time to respond. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/27/2021. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 31, 2021 to File Responsive Pleading filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #10 Protective Order, #6 Notice (Other) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #3 Certificate of Service filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #11 Notice, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #9 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., #4 Notice (Other) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Signed by Clerk on 4/26/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 31, 2021 to File Responsive Pleading by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 4/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Freberg, B) |
Filing 10 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/23/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/23/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/22/2021 Discovery due by 10/23/2021 Dispositive Motions due by 11/27/2021 Signed by Clerk on 4/23/2021.(Freberg, B) |
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Statement of Removal (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. of Pending Motions (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Allan Fritz on behalf of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. from Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, case number FST-CV21-6049709-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6482722, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - Summons_ROS, #3 Exhibit C - State Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D - JS44)(Fritz, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Torres v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lauren Torres | |
Represented By: | Ashling M. Soares |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Allan Fritz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.