Blakey v. Saul
Lisa L. Blakey |
Andrew M. Saul |
Social Security Administration |
3:2021cv00613 |
May 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Robert A Richardson |
Stefan R Underhill |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 8/17/2021. (Blue, A.) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 consent motion for an extension of time to file the certified administrative record until 8/17/2021. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 6/29/2021. (Fries, J.) |
Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until August 17, 2021 to file the ECAR by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of the Executive Director of the Social Security Administration's Office of Appellate Operations)Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Everhart, Kristin) |
Filing 14 Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for all purposes including issuing a Recommended Ruling. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/15/2021.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 13 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 12 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin Everhart on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Everhart, Kristin) |
Filing 10 ORDER. Plaintiff's #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is TERIMINATED, as moot, in light of the Court having granted plaintiff's #8 Second Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. See Doc. #9. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/13/2021. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Second Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #8 . Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, having no income and minimal assets. See generally id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that she lives with, and is supported by, her children, and that she receives "food stamps." Id. at 5. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #8 Second Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/13/2021. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 8 Second MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa L. Blakey. (Katz, Ivan) |
Filing 7 ORDER. Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #3 . That sworn statement, however, is largely unanswered, leaving the Court unable to assess plaintiff's financial circumstances. "The court may deny an application to proceed in forma pauperis if [the applicant] fails to submit the required financial information[.]" Whatley v. Astrue, No. 5:11CV1009(NAM)(ATB), 2011 WL 5222908, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2011), report and recommendation adopted, 2011 WL 5196716 (Oct. 31, 2011); Schwarz v. I.R.S., 998 F. Supp. 201, 202 (N.D.N.Y. 1998) (denying application to proceed in forma pauperis as incomplete where plaintiff failed to complete application).Accordingly, plaintiff shall re-file her motion or pay the required filing fee on or before May 14, 2021, or the undersigned may recommend that this case be dismissed. If plaintiff chooses to re-file her motion she must complete all of the required information, including any monthly obligations, any other sources of financial support (including how any monthly obligations are paid for), or any other information that is pertinent to her financial status, including, for example, any proceeds from lawsuits. Plaintiff may indicate that her obligations are "$0" or that a particular question does not apply to her situation, but she may not leave significant sections of the affidavit form entirely unanswered.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/4/2021. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/4/2021. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/4/2021. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 4 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Reis, Julia) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lisa L. Blakey. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ivan Michael Katz on behalf of Lisa L. Blakey (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Lisa L. Blakey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reis, Julia) |
Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 7/3/2021. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.