Arnold v. Burdick et al
Patricia Arnold |
Prudential Insurance Company of America, Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Carole J. Burdick and Pfizer Inc. |
3:2021cv00628 |
May 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1001 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time until July 14, 2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 06/11/2021. (Millat, C.) |
Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until July 14, 2021, Second Motion on Consent, to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, #1 Notice of Removal by Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Pfizer Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time until June 14, 2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/08/2021. (Millat, C.) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until June 14, 2021, on Consent, to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Notice of Removal by Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Pfizer Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James C. Goodfellow, Jr on behalf of Prudential Insurance Company of America (Goodfellow, James) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Certificate of Filing and Service of Petition for Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #8 Standing Protective Order, #5 Statement Regarding Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Pfizer Inc., #1 Notice of Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #3 Notice of No Pending Motions filed by Pfizer Inc. Signed by Clerk on 05/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 8 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/5/2021. Discovery due by 11/5/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 12/10/2021. Signed by Clerk on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Statement Regarding Removal (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Certificate of Filing and Service of Petition for Removal (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Notice of No Pending Motions (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Pfizer Inc. (Salazar-Austin, David) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pfizer Inc. from Connecticut Superior Court, JD of New London at New London, case number KNL-CV21-6050893-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6499582, filed by Pfizer Inc..(Salazar-Austin, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.