Arnold v. Burdick et al
Plaintiff: Patricia Arnold
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America, Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Carole J. Burdick and Pfizer Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv00628
Filed: May 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Victor A Bolden
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time until July 14, 2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 06/11/2021. (Millat, C.)
June 10, 2021 Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until July 14, 2021, Second Motion on Consent, to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, #1 Notice of Removal by Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Pfizer Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time until June 14, 2021 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/08/2021. (Millat, C.)
May 7, 2021 Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until June 14, 2021, on Consent, to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Notice of Removal by Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC, Pfizer Inc., Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 7, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 7, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James C. Goodfellow, Jr on behalf of Prudential Insurance Company of America (Goodfellow, James)
May 7, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Certificate of Filing and Service of Petition for Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #8 Standing Protective Order, #5 Statement Regarding Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Pfizer Inc., #1 Notice of Removal filed by Pfizer Inc., #3 Notice of No Pending Motions filed by Pfizer Inc. Signed by Clerk on 05/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
May 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/5/2021. Discovery due by 11/5/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 12/10/2021. Signed by Clerk on 05/6/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
May 6, 2021 Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
May 6, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Statement Regarding Removal (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Certificate of Filing and Service of Petition for Removal (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 6, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Pfizer Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal Notice of No Pending Motions (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 6, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by David C. Salazar-Austin on behalf of Pfizer Inc. (Salazar-Austin, David)
May 6, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pfizer Inc. from Connecticut Superior Court, JD of New London at New London, case number KNL-CV21-6050893-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6499582, filed by Pfizer Inc..(Salazar-Austin, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arnold v. Burdick et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
Represented By: James C. Goodfellow, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidelity Brokerage Services (Connecticut) LLC
Represented By: David C. Salazar-Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carole J. Burdick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pfizer Inc.
Represented By: David C. Salazar-Austin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Arnold
Represented By: Stephen E. Reck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?