Hathaway v. U.S. Department of State
Oona A. Hathaway |
U.S. Department of State, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut and U.S. Attorney General |
3:2021cv00691 |
May 19, 2021 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alvin W Thompson |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. § 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by U.S. Department of State.(Larson, John) |
![]() |
Answer deadline updated for U.S. Attorney General to 7/14/2021; U.S. Department of State to 7/14/2021; United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut to 7/14/2021. (Ferguson, L.) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John W. Larson on behalf of U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of State, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut (Larson, John) |
Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 14, 2014 to Respond to #1 Complaint by U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of State, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut. (Larson, John) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oona A. Hathaway. U.S. Attorney General served on 5/24/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Schulz, David) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oona A. Hathaway. United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut served on 5/24/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Schulz, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Oona A. Hathaway. U.S. Department of State served on 5/24/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Schulz, David) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *U.S. Department of State* with answer to complaint due within *30* days. Attorney *David A. Schulz* *Ballard Spahr LLP* *1675 Broadway, 19th Floor* *New York, NY 10019*. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Docket Entry Correction - incorrect answer deadline listed on #6 Electronic Summons Issued. Corrected summons to be issued. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Docket Entry Correction - #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines was entered on the case in error. (Agati, Kathryn) |
Filing 6 ENTERED IN ERROR - ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *U.S. Department of State* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *David A. Schulz* *Ballard Spahr LLP* *1675 Broadway, 19th Floor* *New York, NY 10019*. (Agati, Kathryn) Modified on 5/21/2021 to enter in error (Agati, Kathryn). |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Oona A. Hathaway, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Standing Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 5/20/2021. (Agati, Kathryn) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 ENTERED IN ERROR - Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/18/2021, Discovery due by 11/18/2021, Dispositive Motions due by 12/23/2021. Signed by Clerk on 5/19/2021. (Agati, Kathryn) Modified on 5/21/2021 to enter in error (Agati, Kathryn). |
Judge Alvin W. Thompson added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against U.S. Department of State ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6516047.), filed by Oona A. Hathaway. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Schulz, David) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to U.S. Department of State. (Schulz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.