Bravo Arce v. Saul
| Sonia Noemi Bravo Arce |
| Andrew Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00709 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 07/21/2021. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until September 24, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration in Support)(Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 6/1/2021.(LaLone, L.)
|
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Sonia Noemi Bravo Arce, Andrew Saul. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/1/2021.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Sonia Noemi Bravo Arce Notice, Consent & Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristin Everhart on behalf of Andrew Saul (Everhart, Kristin) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/25/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/25/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs, because her monthly benefits, including "food stamps[,]" just cover her monthly obligations. See generally id. at 3-4. Plaintiff also states that she lives in Section 8 housing. See id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 5/25/2021. (Katz, S.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sonia Noemi Bravo Arce. (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sonia Noemi Bravo Arce.(Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 7/26/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
