Paris v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Bruna Paris |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00711 |
| May 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Post-Discovery Telephonic Status Conference set for March 10, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Victor A. Bolden. Dial: (888) 808-6929; Participant Code: 9284309; Bypass the prompt for a security code. (Tisdale, I.)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER: he Court adopts the following schedule for pre-trial deadlines in this case: Initial disclosures shall be made by August 13, 2021;Damages analyses shall be due by October 1, 2021;Plaintiff's designation of expert witnesses and reports shall be due by October 1, 2021;Depositions of Plaintiff's expert witnesses shall be completed by December 3, 2021;Defendants designation of expert witnesses and reports shall be due by January 7, 2022;Depositions of Defendant's expert witnesses shall be completed by March 4, 2022;Depositions of Plaintiff's and Defendant's fact witnesses shall be completed by March 4, 2022;All discovery shall be completed by March 4, 2022;Post-Discovery Telephonic Status Conference will be held on March 10, 2022 at 11:00 a.m.;Dispositive motions are to be filed by June 3, 2022; any responses to dispositive motions are to be filed by June 24, 2022; and any replies to any responses to dispositive motions are to be filed by July 8, 2022;The Joint Trial Memorandum shall be due by August 5, 2022, or thirty (30) days after the Court's decision on any dispositive motions;Trial ready by September 6, 2022, or thirty (30) days after the Court's decision on any dispositive motions. (Tisdale, I.)
|
|
Filing 13
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Sabatini, James)
|
|
Filing 12
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #7 MOTION for Attorney(s) Micala Campbell Robinson to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6530435) by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Frederick, Steven)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary Thomas Gain on behalf of Bruna Paris (Gain, Zachary)
|
|
Filing 10
Corporate Disclosure Statement by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Frederick, Steven)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by United Parcel Service, Inc..(Frederick, Steven)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Micala Campbell Robinson, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 8/2/2021. Signed by Clerk on 6/3/2021. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Attorney(s) Micala Campbell Robinson to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6530435) by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Micala Campbell Robinson)(Frederick, Steven)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 Notice of Pending Motion filed by United Parcel Service, Inc., #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by United Parcel Service, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 05/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/25/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 05/25/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/24/2021. Discovery due by 11/24/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 12/29/2021. Signed by Clerk on 05/25/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by United Parcel Service, Inc. --Notice of Pending Motion (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kierkut, Galit)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by United Parcel Service, Inc. from Superior Court of Hartford Judicial District, Connecticut, case number HHD-CV21-6141898-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6521395, filed by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A&B, #2 Certificate of Service)(Kierkut, Galit)
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Paris v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Galit Kierkut |
| Represented By: | Steven M. Frederick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bruna Paris | |
| Represented By: | James V. Sabatini |
| Represented By: | Zachary Thomas Gain |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
