Keels v. Waterbury et al
Plaintiff: James Keels
Defendant: City of Waterbury and Michale Richards
Case Number: 3:2021cv00750
Filed: June 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915A. For the reasons set forth in the attached order, the Court DISMISSES this action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. If Keels has grounds to allege facts that overcome the concerns set forth in this ruling, then he may file a motion to reopen and an amended complaint on or before August 13, 2021. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 07/14/2021. (Johnson, R.)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at anytime during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 6/10/21. (Payton, R.)
June 2, 2021 Filing 7 Docket Entry Modify to add, correct PDF re #6 Electronic Filing Order, (Gutierrez, Y.)
June 2, 2021 Docket Entry Correction: The text entry for the standing order on prisoner efiling program #5 was corrected to reflect the correct Judge who signed the order. (Barry, Donna)
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/1/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/2/2021: #1 REPLACEMENT PDF) (Gutierrez, Y.).
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/1/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.) Modified on 6/2/2021 to correct the signing judge (Barry, Donna).
June 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/1/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
June 1, 2021 Filing 3 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Keels. (Gutierrez, Y.)
June 1, 2021 Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by James Keels. (Gutierrez, Y.) Modified on 6/2/2021 to correct restriction (Gutierrez, Y.).
June 1, 2021 Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against City of Waterbury, Michale Richards, filed by James Keels.(Gutierrez, Y.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keels v. Waterbury et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Keels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Waterbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michale Richards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?