Carnicelli v. Fareri et al
| James Carnicelli, Jr. |
| Christopher Sheskier, Julie Fareri and John J. Fareri |
| Gateway Development Group, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv00792 |
| June 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1452 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docket Entry Correction re 24 Order. Modified to give entry a document number. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 24
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Transfer to Another District. The motion is granted for substantially the reasons stated therein. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/2/21. (Taylor, L.) Modified on 8/3/2021 to give docket entry a document number (Bozek, M.).
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER denying #11 Motion to Substitute Party. The motion is denied as moot, in light of the order granting the motion to transfer. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/2/21. (Taylor, L.)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting #19 Motion to Withdraw #14 Objection. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/19/2021. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER denying as moot #13 Motion to Remand to State Court in light of the request to withdrawal the motion. See ECF No. 20. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/19/2021. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #18 Motion to Withdraw #13 Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/19/2021. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Withdraw #14 Objection by James Carnicelli, Jr. (Pastore, Joseph) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Withdraw #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by James Carnicelli, Jr. (Pastore, Joseph) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Consent Motion for Extension of Time until 14 days from the date the Bankruptcy Court issues a decision on the Motion to Dismiss to file, (i) a reply memorandum in response to Carnicelli's opposition memorandum to the Transfer Motion; and (ii) a memorandum in opposition to the memorandum in support of the Remand Motion. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/1/2021. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time until 14 days from Bankruptcy Court ruling to file memorandum directed to Carnicelli's memorandum in opposition to the Transfer Motion and a memorandum in opposition to the memorandum in support of the Remand Motion by Gateway Development Group, Inc.. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 15 Memorandum in Support re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court , #8 MOTION to Transfer to Another District filed by Howard Magaliff, Chapter 7 Trustee of Gateway Development Group, Inc. filed by James Carnicelli, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Award of Arbitrators, #2 Exhibit Memorandum of Decision on Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit Joint Scheduling Order)(Pastore, Joseph) |
| Filing 14 WITHDRAWN - OBJECTION to Motion to Transfer Venue filed by James Carnicelli, Jr. (Pastore, Joseph) Modified on 7/21/2021 (Imbriani, Susan). |
| Filing 13 WITHDRAWN- MOTION to Remand to State Court by James Carnicelli, Jr.Responses due by 7/7/2021 (Pastore, Joseph) Modified on 7/21/2021 (Imbriani, Susan). |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Johanna G. Zelman on behalf of John J. Fareri (Zelman, Johanna) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Substitute Party - Chapter 7 Trustee as Plaintiff for Derivative Claims and as a Party in Place of the Gateway Development Group, Inc. by Gateway Development Group, Inc.. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Howard P Magaliff on behalf of Gateway Development Group, Inc. on behalf of Howard Magaliff, Chapter 7 Trustee for Gateway Development Group, Inc. (Magaliff, Howard) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Pastore on behalf of James Carnicelli, Jr (Pastore, Joseph) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer to Another District filed by Howard Magaliff, Chapter 7 Trustee of Gateway Development Group, Inc. by Gateway Development Group, Inc.. (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Irve J. Goldman on behalf of Gateway Development Group, Inc. Chapter 7 Trustee Howard Magaliff (Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gateway Development Group, Inc. from Bankr. S.D.N.Y., case number 21-22304., filed by Gateway Development Group, Inc..(Goldman, Irve) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Gateway Development Group, Inc., #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 06/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 06/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 06/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2021. Discovery due by 12/10/2021. Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2022. Signed by Clerk on 06/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Gateway Development Group, Inc. from State of Connecticut Superior Court of Stamford, case number FST-CV-20-6048778-S . Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6540731, filed by Gateway Development Group, Inc.(Goldman, Irve) Modified on 6/10/2021 to correct filer(Hushin, Z.). Modified on 6/11/2021 to correct removed case # (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
